Current Activities
In addition to the basic research of the laboratory involving
the elemental characterization of materials such as bone, pottery, stone,
pigments, soil, shell, and mortar, we have several areas of specific
research:
Collaborative projects
have included compositional studies of bone assemblages
from many sites and contexts throughout the world. The composite data base
resulting from these studies, which now includes more than three thousand
analyses, is producing new methods of inquiry about paleodiet.
Our interest in
the alkaline-earth elements in bone has led to research in the isotopic
patterns of strontium and lead in bones and teeth. Through comparisons
of strontium isotopes in bone and tooth enamel we were also able to successfully
identify immigrants among various residential groups at the archaeological
site of Grasshopper in central Arizona. We are currently further developing
this technique to access individual life histories as well as continuing
the study of migration patterns in Central and South America and Europe.
We also have been
exploring the development of an efficient, inexpensive, and easily accessible
means of chemically characterizing archaeological ceramics.
This method was recently used to obtain many thousands of compositional
analyses of pottery from the southwestern U.S. to understand the evolution
of the Salado Polychroime tradition. We are enhancing our existing
methods to include the laser microprobe to provide direct analysis of the
solid matrix of potsherds and to extend our studies to obsidian and other
lithic materials. We are also using X-ray diffraction analyses to examine
pigments and other fine-grained materials.
A further pursuit
is the chemical analysis of soils from modern, ethnographic
contexts and from archaeological sites to discern chemical patterns representing
functional behaviours. This has been applied to soils from archaeological
contexts in the United States, Guatemala, and Oaxaca, and is currently
being used to study living-floor sediments from Catalhöyük.
Other projects
include the chemical "fingerprinting" of a wide variety of archaeological
materials, recent sucesses include being able to distinguish archaeological
shells from different sources and map prehistoric trade routes.
Assessment of factors affecting barium and strontium levels
in bone
Recent investigations of barium and strontium reveal that there are quantitative
relationships between environmental levels of barium and strontium and
levels of these elements in bone. Bone-chemistry projects have included
bone assemblages from historic cemeteries in Ireland, Neandertal specimens
from Yugoslavia, bone from Nelson Bay Cave in South Africa, from the American
Southwest and the coasts of South America, and many other sites and contexts.
The composite data base resulting from these studies, which now includes
more than five thousand analyses, is producing new methods of inquiry about
paleodiet, paleoclimate, and even provenience. One significant example
of such is the recognition that barium is an indicator of marine versus
terrestrial resources in the diet. Other significant results have included
procedures for evaluating and minimizing the post-depositional chemical
contamination of archaeological bone, which to-date has been the most serious
obstacle of trace element studies. Current research focuses upon
environmental factos influencing the distributions of elements in bone,
extending our research to elements beyond the alkaline-earth elements,
and the study of isotopic patterns in skeletal materials.
Strontium isotopes in human teeth and bones as a monitor
of mobility
Direct evidence of human residential mobility has been difficult to obtain
in prehistory. Archaeologists have generally used artifact styles as a
proxy for people to investigate population movement. We approach this problem
by comparing strontium isotope ratios in human bones and in teeth . Dental
enamel forms during early childhood and retains Sr isotopes from the local
geology at that time, while bone, which is chemically remodeled, assimilates
Sr isotopes reflecting residence during the last years of one's life. Thus
differences in strontium isotope ratios between bone and tooth enamel reveal
movement during the life of the individual. Strontium isotope ratios in
teeth that do not match those of the local geology should indicate immigrants
to a site. Results of such analyses allow us to document the structure
of population movement at both intraregional and interregional levels,
and how these patterns contribute to an understanding of intrasite variability.
Comparisons of strontium isotope ratios in human bone among sites, along
with analysis of local bedrock and faunal remains, further define the strontium
isotope compositions for the region and constrain the areas from which
mobile individuals were leaving. A strontium isotope study of bone and
teeth from the site of Grasshopper in the American Southwest has demonstrated
that there are measurable and meaningful differences between bones and
teeth from the same individuals, among individuals from the same site,
and between communities in the study area.
An efficient method for chemically characterizing potsherds
We recently developed an efficient chemical methodthat
reliably correlates genetically related ceramics with one another. The
method uses an ionic-extraction of the ceramic paste that is highly sensitive
to the composition of the clay paste and to production parameters such
as firing temperature. In all test cases, the method was able to correctly
correlate fired, tempered clays regardless of temper, and to match potsherds
with one another and with the archaeological clay from which they were
made. In tests using modern ethnographic ceramics of known provenience,
the method not only correctly differentiated the vessels by village, but
also by individual potters. In an archaeological example, the method was
used to chemically differentiate intrusive ceramics appearing at archaeological
sites on the Oaxaca coast and to match them chemically with stylistically
similar wares from Monte Alban. It is currently being used to analyze many
thousands of sherds from the southwestern U.S. to trace the evolution of
various ceramic traditions. It is also being explored as a method for assessing
firing temperatures.
Although we are using ICP spectroscopy, a
highly-sensitive multi-element technique, it was possible in test cases
to reliably correlate ceramics with only three or four elements, detectable
at levels which could be measured by widely available instrumentation (e.g.
flame atomic absorption) and at extraordinarily low costs. While our ceramic
analyses are addressing archaeological problems, the primary objective
is to develop a reliable method of ceramic compositional analysis that
can be used by those without access to sophisticated instrumentation or
large research budgets.
The chemical characteristics of anthropogenic soils
Human activities can impact soil formation to the extent that natural soil
formation is altered and a new, human influenced (anthropogenic or anthropic)
soil formed. can be substantially different from adjacent, contemporary,
natural soils. These differences can be interpreted, and the behavior that
led to their creation reconstructed. This has long been recognized with
respect to phosphorus, but only recently with respect to a wider range
of elements and compounds also found in anthropogenic soils. Multielement
analysis by ICP/AES of an acid extract of soil provides a rapid and inexpensive
means of characterizing the properties of anthropogenic soils. Samples
(as little as .5g) can be collected on a uniform grid from a house floor,
or from selected features. Comparison between archaeological soils and
soils from a contemporary paleo-land surface or sterile context allow the
identification of activity areas, hearths, floor areas, and external surfaces.
These data can aid in the interpretation of the spatial organization within
a structure and in the identification of specific features. The laboratory
has analyzed soils from a wide range of modern and archaeological contexts
including Mexico, the United States, Canada, Sweden, Denmark, and the Middle
East. This database provides a powerful aid in the interpretation of archaeological
chemical residues in soils.
This page maintained by J. Burton <jhburton@facstaff.wisc.edu>,
last updated February 1999.